In the real world, actions have consequences. As it turns out, inaction has consequences as well. Here's a chart from today's NY Times, projecting the effect past reform efforts would have had on health care spending:
Clearly, the earlier the reform had occurred, the better off we'd be now. It doesn't take a math major to recognize the trend of that increasingly steep "actual" line.
Nearly every mainstream analysis calls for medical costs to continue to climb over the next decade, outpacing the growth in the overall economy and certainly increasing faster than the average paycheck. Those higher costs will translate into higher premiums, which will mean fewer individuals and businesses will be able to afford insurance coverage. More of everyone’s dollar will go to health care, and government programs like Medicare and Medicaid will struggle to find the money to operate.
“It will break all of our banks if we do nothing,” said Peter V. Lee, who oversees national health policy for the Pacific Business Group on Health, which represents employers that offer coverage to workers. “It is a course that is literally bankrupting the federal government and businesses and individuals across the country.”
The Democrats have had the opportunity to sell health care reform a couple different ways. First is the moral imperative of assuring all our citizens fair and equal access to health care. Barack Obama raised it once, in his September address to Congress, but never brought it up again.
Perhaps Democrats thought talking about empathy and compassion pushed them too far into "bleeding heart liberal" territory. But this argument that health care costs are unsustainable has never been fully asserted either.
Republicans may be a wee bit shortsighted here. While this tactic of delaying reform may be paying some short term dividends for Republicans, health care costs continue to rise and folks become increasingly vulnerable to losing their insurance coverage. There will be a tipping point when states can no longer fund Medicaid programs and enough people have either already lost their benefits or can no longer afford them and, at that point, they'll go looking for someone to blame and the fastest remedy.
Republicans, God willing, would take the blame and the fastest, most sure remedy is a public option. Now that would be some just desserts for the GOP.



Recent Comments